Yes I did read your post and if providing factual information is considered absolutely and completely ranting....

If I was trying to rant at you as you so eloquently put it, I would have mentioned that attorneys do not 'direct' their clients, they act under advice from their clients. I would have told you that 'frequently' attorneys request is not supported by I spoke to so and so and so and so told me. I would have also mentioned that anecdotal evidence is the poorest form of evidence to support your thesis and the sentences, '.... no one ever finds out' and 'OJ took one and failed... ' are mutually exclusive and contradict themselves because apparently people do find out. I may have asked you what part of -

Because in essence I could send you to 20 'independent' people who administer polygraphs until we got the result we wanted, let for the sake of an argument you failed 17, inconclusive in 2 but 1 showed no deception.

didn't you understand?

Of course the attorney doesn't get the money for administering the poly but you've never worked in a law firm have you? Clients can be billed by the minute, certainly every 15 minutes of your working day are allocated to one. How much extra time do you think a client has to be in front of their attorney if they're sent around the world trying to get a poly to say what you want it to say?

Finally but not least I would have congratulated you on your deductive powers which goes like this. As an attorney, if your client hasn't already been administered a polygraph test by the police, you would 'frequently' advise them to do another 20 polygraphs until they got one that showed no deception then forward that to police and the prosecutor's office so they can nicely drop the charges.

Do you still think the Ramseys took one? [serious]