If so to any of your questions, wouldn't he have to admit to being party to corruption, being an assessory to federal crimes with long statutes of limitations he may not have cleared yet, some horrible emotionally unsettling events he wants behind him now that he's got a brand new account mainly messing around with rock painting and the escape to Rick & Morty cartoon show Easter eggs, just AFTER he was just rudely , aggressively asked about corruption, graft, and potential assessory to institutional law enforcement corruption?

Would his deepest fears and nightmares be cathardic to discuss, you really feel?

Rhetorical . Just highlighting the hypocricy of telling me about tact and approach when seeking responses, and thinking things through past surface appearance, while hinting at consequence.

Interesting, isn't it? Both of us have invaded his personal mindspace with queries and comments regarding incredibly deep and emotionally charged aspects to his past employment.

Who's to say I was tactless and misguided and your queries were prudent and thoughtful, respectful of his potential sensitivity?

Just food for thought.