Every single other game that uses this absolutely atrocious anticheat also has vast numbers of people complaining about this horrible feature, APB, Battlefield, Infestation and of course, The Division

Actually FairFight is very highly praised for its success in Battlefield. It has essentially removed all cheaters (except for Vanilla servers, thanks to GameTime). If you're basing it off searches in Google, you should be aware that when FF kicked in on BF4, cheat forums encouraged all users to post everywhere claiming they had been falsely banned. It's a shame it doesn't work that well for this game, but with a potential client side anti-cheat coming (which BF4 also had) it may work this well for this game in the future.

As for you specifically, I don't know. Nobody does, and we can only guess. I'm pretty sure I remember them saying that player reports alone will not cause it to take action, so it still needs to catch you doing something that it thinks is dodgy as well. Assuming that you don't teamkill or use abusive language, there are still other things you could get caught for. A recent change is that macros and exploiting glitches can also get you banned now. I have alt-tabbed from the game many times, most games in fact (to do stuff on my other monitor while I'm dead/between rounds), yet I've never been banned. We have no evidence from you either. In fact, you're using a throwaway account. It reminds me of the posts we got in /r/battlefield_4 once FF started working, with cheaters making throwaway accounts to spam the subreddit with false accusations of false bans in an attempt to get FF removed so they could cheat. To be clear, I understand that FF is not effective at all in this game, and that something needs to be done. But this post is pure speculation and has absolutely no evidence to back anything up, and as far as we're concerned, you could be a cheater angry at getting caught.