I like your post. Its like you were reading my posts last night heh. I think your idea is pretty Kierkegaardian. You also hit on the unity of truth (which is some Christians have forgotten about today) and why there is no and an be no conflict between science and faith. And its unity, not uniformity, that's important. And when we say Jesus is the Logos made flesh we're saying Jesus is the truth or ultimate reality revealed in a human being, though that's certainly not a complete definition of the Word/Logos. And I like that what Christianity does is it makes truth and love inseparable by saying that God is love as it does outright in 1 John 4:16. And then to say that it was made flesh and dwelt among us adds so much more, and then add transubstantiation where it comes to us at the Mass and we take it into ourselves. This also explains why the RCC is so strict about who can and how one should receive it.
What got you interested in this?