again leading, they exist big deal, anyone can have them, you just need to find a chick that settles for you and then make her life marvelous. Blue pill strategy over oh yes they exist!

because they suck for the man, because the woman doesn't really love, not like a RPW and because it degenerates into soul crushing abuse, that makes men misarable in the long run as your(plural) agenda becomes exclusively your(sg) agenda. The man just becomes a accessory. A cute one at that, and you do love him, but that just means you won't hurt him purposefully like a dog, but you will move and manipulate him to get your goals met and he will not because he is a good guy, and when he does it's just small shit you berate him for. those men aren't actually happy! they're miserable! so no they don't exist!

Do you even read what you wrote before posting

This whole essay is just you reasoning your way through her anecdotes to fit your own world view, coupled with a whole heap of assumptions and speculations on her relationship based on shitty generalizations you've been taught by strangers over the internet. Otherwise I really don't see what information made you think her SO is a puppet under her agenda.

why wouldn't you? The partner you loved was asking you to be intimite with him and you "don't want to". How would you feel if you come tired and stressed and want to cuddle with your SO and he says: I don't want to. Whould that not strike you as manipulative? resentfull? mean? Please help me understand your line of reasoning that if someone doesn't have as high of a sex drive as her partner and she/he doesn't do what his partner wants her/him to do, it's manipulation; what on earth is manipulative about saying "no"? If this kind of "manipulation" is bad, and if there shouldn't be manipulation in a relationship, why do you even subscribe to theredpill's school of thought?

This is only a fraction of my problems with this post.