Difference is, when a woman aborts a child, the man is not left with a bill in perpetuity. When a man abandons a child, someone still needs to support it.

A man can't walk away because someone needs to support the kid, but a woman can end the possibility of the child being born?

Look, I'm pro-choice when it comes to abortion, but this logic doesn't really work. In the case a man walks away, the child lives (just with less resources and one parent). In the case a woman walks away, the child doesn't even get the chance to live!

Again, I'm pro-choice, and abortion should be legal. But abortion is obviously worse for the child than it is being born with a bit less money.