That's a far cry from "men cannot be raped", although saying that does prop up your narrative. *Correction. I should have said, according to the CDC, women cannot rape.

If you include male victims who have been "made to penetrate" in a year, it's about the same as female victims of rape. Their figures are 1,267,000 to 1,270,000 respectively? This does not even include men who were penetrated.

I'm no expert, but I've taken enough classes to familiarize myself with second wave misandrists like Valerie Solanas, Robin Morgan, and Catherine Mackinnon. Goodbye to all that, indeed. Must I accept the premise that we live in a patriarchal, male privileged rape culture?

Jackson Katz does.

Thanks for the disclaimer. Here's what Harvard had to say. To bad the study's been scrubbed.

I was under the impression that these issues were important enough to you to warrant a little research.

I guess I fooled you.

It's not sexist to deal with the most prevalent forms of sexual violence as a priority

Absolutely, it's just not as simple as man perpetrator, woman victim. And yes, why not include queer and trans people as well?

They aren't perfect but they also aren't propaganda from the holy feminist misandry council as you seem to suggest.

I knew there was a council somewhere. It's propaganda alright and it's brought about by feminist theories of rape culture, the findings of which have been proven to be totally distorted and unrepresentative. No, 1 in 5 women are NOT victims of rape.

Must be my liberal indoctrination.

It's never too late.

Violence against men happens (usually but not always because of other men) and this fact ought to be respected and researched (which has been/is being done by well respected feminist and queer theory scholars).

Look, I can accept that this is likely true in all of history across the world, however, I'm highly skeptical of any feminist studies after reading how they've come to believe we live in a rape culture. Feminism is a political ideology that I just do not subscribe to.