That is a completely biased and unreliable source.

I have been studying the quran, learning word-by-word translations and context of every single letter in it. The verses that were sent during a period of war and battle are the ones that people try to point at, but it is important to look at the context pf each verse and analyze the history behind it. So many people ignore even the verses right before and after just to fit their agenda. For example, people like to point out these verses: {And fight in the cause of God those who have (initially) waged war against you, but do not transgress limits (by causing more damage to your enemy than the damage they initially caused you, thereby expanding the circle of war). Indeed, Allah loves not transgressors.

And slay them wherever you overtake them and expel them from where they have expelled you (a reference to Quraysh who for 14 years had been expelling the Muslims from Makkah), for tumult and oppression (that Quraysh heavily incurred on you) are worse than killing; but fight them not at the Inviolable House of Worship, unless they (first) fight you there. If they were to fight you, then do not be reluctant to kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers (in the sanctity of the Holy Shrine of Ka’ba).} (Al-Baqarah 2: 190-91)

and twist them into "Look at this verse it commands muslims to kill all of us such hateful people!" instead of what they are actually saying (fight back against only those that fight you first but do not cause them more damage than they caused you). This isn't even a matter of interpreting verses their own way, it is just clear and blatant twisting of the verse.