Holy hell man what a load of bullshit. So this is part of the article which claims this

If these accounts are correct, Pakistan was cooperating with Qatar, and perhaps others, to move international Sunni jihadists (including 300 Pakistanis) from Pakistan’s tribal areas, where they were no longer needed, to new battlefields in Syria.

Ok. First off...maybe Pakistan...just like the UK, France and Sweden...isn't 100% perfect when it comes to stopping their citizens from joining militant ranks in Syria? Not everything needs to be a government conspiracy.

Second..the same New York Times claims that Pakistan is supporting the Afghan Taliban.

Well, if that's true..then this news cant be true because ISIS in Afghanistan is directly in conflict with the Afghan Taliban. Why would Pakistan be facilitating a militant group fighting its own proxy?

More importantly, why would Pakistan be facilitating ISIS thousands of miles away when it has no interest in doing so? Pakistan literally has no interest in doing this. None. Not even money. If money was an interest that the military was pursuing, then they would've said yes to Saudia when it asked for Pakistani help in Yemen.

But no. Pakistan does not want to touch whatever the fuck is going in the ME with a 10-foot pole. That's why it flat out denied requests for help in Yemen despite Saudi, Bahraini, Emirati and Qatari pressure.

And there's a reason Pakistan doesnt want to do that. Pakistan is already in its final stages of its Operation in the tribal belt and is very close in achieving complete and total success against the radical groups there. The army knows that any conflict it partakes in right now has the potential to backfire and scuttle the precious $46 billion CPEC deal. Pakistani foreign policy has become very isolationist these past few years; hell the only reason it's still involved in Afghanistan is to counter the encroaching Indian influence there.