Last one:

The regulation of a medical procedure that only one sex can undergo does not trigger heightened con- stitutional scrutiny unless the regulation is a “mere pre- tex[t] designed to effect an invidious discrimination against members of one sex or the other. Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U. S. 484, 496, n. 20 (1974). And as the Court has stated, the “goal of preventing abortion” does not constitute “invidiously discriminatory animus” against women. Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U. S. 263, 273–274 (1993) (internal quotation marks omitted)”

“I don’t think the fascism required to enforce of abortion bans are designed to control women’s bodies. Why? Because a group of protestors trying to convince women to not get abortions didn’t hate women.”