Hitting someone and someone them are both bad, but one is clearly worse than the other. Identifying the differences isn't apologizing for either.

Yeah, the war in Afghanistan has gone on longer. Saying one was justified and the other was not is wrong.

Well that's like, your opinion man. NATO allies felt there was a point and so got invoked as a complete organization, not just two or three members.

Coalition =/= NATO.

Japan wasn't part of NATO, they got involved. New Zealand and Australia weren't part of NATO, they got involved. Now you're using post-hoc rationalization. "The invasion was justified because other NATO members got involved even though Article 13 was never invoked because Afghanistan never declared war on America"

Pathetic POS; long as Bernie supported it, so did you. Bernie also voted to invade Iraq in 1998, bet you supported that. He also voted for the Libya intervention, got your support there.

You're a warmonger. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯