problem with Jason: OJ's physical evidence. his DNA and shoe prints. solution: OJ was tbere at least. problem with glove. solution is Jason was wearing. problem with knife. solutio is Jason had it. OJ would know the glove wouldn't fit in court. that solves the glove not fitting. problem with Nicole's finger nail DNA: it was Jason's. problem with Jason: OJ acted guilty. solution: he participated at least. but there's nothing that says he had to be alone. solves the problem of how OJ overpowered both Nicole and Ron if Jason was doing it too. it becomes 2vs2 instead of 1vs2 for either OJ or Jason. it would be easier for both of them to do it without sustaining significant injuries. would explain why Ron had struggle wounds if one of them was restraining him and the other stabbed. it explains the article with all the Jason stuff. it all fits. it doesn't mean it has to rule out OJ. we reasonably can't rule out OJ because of the physical evidence. but adding Jason also explains everything in the article. it also explains so well anything that could possibily be unexplained about the case. just add Jason. I can't rule out OJ. but the stuff on Jason is convincing. so instead of ruling either out I just added both to the crime and suddenly everything makes sense. if that's what happened then that's what everyone overlooked and why the case failed. because too many people thought like you and wouldn't consider the possibilities. whereas the conspiracy theory types were missing the reasonable stuff. that's why no one was gettikg it. that's what everyone missed. it was both. you missee it too. humbling isn't it?