Thank you for taking the time to formulate a rational response. If I may I would like to respond numerically to your numbered points.
He may very well have approached calmly because he knew the man was dead. But this goes completely against cop training. We;ve seen videos of multiple cops that have shot up a man that no longer moves, keeping firearms trained on the subject until the subject is restrained.
I am no video expert. Who enhanced the video? That one enhancement made it slowed and quite clear that an object was deposited. Why not stabilize and enhance the whole video. The enhancement is like some CSI television show where they enhance telescopically a vehicle license plate from far away.
3.There is no blood visible on the victims back at any time, even at the end where the shooter checks the vitals of the victim. No blood anywhere.
Perhaps he was. Perhaps in shock or deep thought of taking a life.
Is there a struggle in the grass prior to the shooting that is captured by video and broadcast? Or is that supposed fact along the same fashion of the man taking the taser and the cop feared for his life having to shoot him as in the original official narrative?
They are either first responders trained in basic life support or not. Regulations demand that they care for the very subject they have sued deadly force against, after the situation has stabilized. Allowing a proper airway, even to an obvious corpse, is more logical that patching up some back wounds to said corpse if the intention is to show proper procedure.
I am not a camera expert and I acquiesce that I know little about such matters. I have seen iPhones stick to a vertical or landscape layout from the time one starts the video capture, causing the video to go 90 degrees change at the moment of orientation change of the device when viewing post capture.