Your problem is you are generalizing too much. You're generalizing every statement I've made as well as every statement you make. You're bound to end up with unrealistic scenarios. The thing is when you make "No, we don't" statements, it's a sign you're taking my post too personally when it isn't meant to be that way, and a sign that you're overgeneralizing. If I were to mock you for this habit of overgeneralizing and relate it to you being a schulich student, I would have been condescending towards you, but I haven't done that.
I don't know if you can quite call my posts condescending when I've also talked about the positives of the program without bringing those down. I see my posts about hand-shaking classes as jokes but you see them as condescension. There's no superiority in my posts or comparisons between myself and schulich students so I don't think condescending is the right word to use here.
Your personal experience with academic difficulty may say one thing but unfortunately that is yet again another overgeneralization. I think you're putting too much emotion into proving the existence of one overgeneralization of schulich students over another, and it isn't doing you any good. At the end of the day it's just another program at york. I don't know if the whole "distancing oneself from york" is prevalent with this year's cohort of students, but that was one of the initial quirks of a decent number of schulich students that snowballed into something bigger.
Sadly, your choice of words distances york from schulich which doesn't help your case. If you say "academic difficulty is more higher than the york courses [...]", well... those adms courses at schulich are york courses themselves. I know it wasn't your intention to do it condescendingly but that distancing is what started the "reputation" you're denying.
