Haven't we already gone over this??
This is why I'm so confused about why you're so intent on making this particular point?
I apologize in advance for using more than a couple sentences to explain this, but I feel like I need to make it very clear:
Now factories aren't all robots that get depreciated per unit. They also have costs that are depreciated just by time (straight line, sum of years, etc.), this can change year to year, but it's not dependent on units. So when a factory first opens up, these fixed costs will contribute more per unit when production is low, and less if it's high. Also many depreciation formulas have much more initial depreciation, that decreases over time, so assuming no significant changes we should expect depreciation per unit to decrease over time.
As far as I can tell, this expected trend on a per unit basis, decreasing over time with one factory, and then jumping up when a second (lower volume) factory starts selling units, is exactly what we've seen with Tesla. This is what you see with basically any company, it's not surprising or unexpected.