Really cause you sound like an idiot. Even making an assertion like that when you don't know me. I studied a STEM career. And yes there are tons of articles on psychology journals on this stuff, Rollo has even co-written some, if you bothered to do the research. But we're not talking about digging into journals. You said:

None of those people with PHDs would agree you can know what an entire gender generally wants.

Well I can tell you one thing. I can tell you that I know exactly what the male gender wants. Males want women of reproductive age that exhibit healthy reproductive signs like big mammaries, child birthing hips, fair skin, feminine child like facial features. The entire male gender want these things from women, its inherent in our biology.

The argument here is not about anything being "valid science" or having gone through peer review. There are tons of knowledgeable sources from millions upon millions of books that have not been peer reviewed, that does not make them invalid.

I don't care enough to dig through and find you peer reviewed sources for each of the things talked about in these books. I can give a rats ass about your requirements. You are a dumb kid who refuses to give in to the fact that he knows jack shit about women and he does not have the inclination not capacity to learn.

The discrepancy is you not finding Rollo's phd credentials because you didn't even know he was a PHD and using that to pretend everything you have been writing is valid. Well sorry to tell you you were wrong about that, and none of what you've been asserting is true. You keep pulling shit out of your ass, like having read all the books, so stupid. Really what the heck am I even arguing with someone as idiotic as you making so many patently false assertions.