What makes a cup not not a cup?

"The cup is a lie". The facts and features assigned to a cup are assigned by us. A limited infinite set of whole numbers will always be a limited infinite set of whole numbers because as long as it is based in mathematical laws there are no other potentials. We believe Romeo was not actually called Lewis because, simplifying evidence of the play's existence, because we inductively perceive whatever is most supported to be true. The cup is a cup because we assigned the cup what a cup should be and what a cup should do. Those potentials about what a cup could be are up to human interpretation. The "concrete" thing that those concepts are tied too are simply bound by what the human mind thinks. "Human" is the thing that breaks the possibilty line of reasoning. You are comparing the infinite sets of

/r/askphilosophy Thread