No, I was not the first to throw any insult. I am defending common sense and simply awaiting a legitimate response. I will respond if attacked, and I have.

You've either lied, been incorrect, or used insults when responding. Every single time. There is not one response where you haven't.

My sentence makes perfect sense. Attempt rereading something if it confuses you, instead of quoting it and saying it confuses you.

Yes, you have. I do not need to state why sanders voted for the 94 crime bill, as Sanders has said that himself, which after hours and hours and response after response, you still haven't watched that debate where he explains it, proving how uninformed you are. The merits of my candidate do not need to be discussed because he is automatically the best choice when running against a fascist bigot and someone who is a known corrupt individual. I look like someone telling the truth, to someone who asshole hear is you, the one who repeats himself with the intention of being correct the second tim, while not heading my first response and listening to what sanders said about the bill. And you still won't listened to him, because you'd rather vote for a fascist bigot or so prone corrupt, this is the point. The ignorant are willfully ignorant at this point and refuse to stop bringing up talking points which have been addressed. You are still talking about something sanders addressed, when you and the media thought they had something against him. He perfectly explains why, but you'd rather me releat it then use your own head. You'd rather be told what the truth is rather than be objective enough to find it yourself. You've proven the type of person you are and it makes sense you'd be shaded to vote for a fascist bigot or someone corrupt, you aren't objective enough not to,