Who's being inflexible with labels and definitions now?

You?

Competition is very often times not overt, but it is ever present.

Nobody claimed it's absent. You're attacking a straw man.

It's your idea versus another's in a board room or simple team meeting. It's your game versus another (or hundreds) in dating, etc.

You've completely missed the point while raging with your teenage angst.

Point is that the person who doesn't obsess with this competition and winning wins at the end. People who have good relationships don't obsess about fucking more women. People who build wealth aren't obsessed about wealth, but their vision. An idea.

Competition is ever present and mostly hidden. It's not only, or mostly, some obvious physical confrontation.

Stating the obvious are we?

How do you think one "vision" is built while another's is not?

Because when one fool is obsessed with beating others, another is working hard to make his idea real.

That's ridiculous. Just, blindingly stupid.

No. Read it slowly again. Take a few deep breaths.

Humankind has been competing against each other and nature since we evolved. It's not owned by our species, let alone white people.

So? For majority of human existence humans walked around naked. Didn't use a computer or drive a car. Tell me more about how you want to relinquish all these Alpha/beta in human dating came from white dudes "pick up" game. In research it doesn't even apply to humans. So you're literally buying into unscientific hogwash.

Defining it in those terms gives all the power to them, the opposite of what you're trying to do.

Rejecting their notions and embracing our masculinity with confidence is my way of defeating it.