It depends on the makeup of your class mates, their prior perspective and experience.

At a guess you may experience misunderstanding, people not being receptive to the relevance of the material and alternative viewpoint, possibly some ridicule. Or the opposite. Who knows, it's hard to say.

Jung's a footnote in current dominant paradigms, in general. If you can find material that links his ideas to what is current understanding you may gain more traction of interest (i.e., Jean Knox's work, John Haule, or Erik Godwin discussing the 'neurobiology of the Gods', etc), or if you frame his work in relation to say aspects of neuroscience, neuroplasticity for example, and make links via that route with shamanism and/or psychedelics (which are regaining some value from a psychotherapeutic angle), and trace that to efficacy in regards to psychopsthology (studies?) You may find more receptivity.