I don't know about the subject, but in my opinion psychoanalysts shouldn't deal with trauma, especially since they happen to suggest to a person traumatic experiences that they didn't experience irl, and tear wounds that were almost healed. It didn't help me, the psychoanalyst only brought out my family's psychological trauma from 2 generations (after World War II). All in all, I'm not sure if the Jungian therapist helped or hurt me more. I have no evidence, but I suspect that he only build foundation to psychosis attack in me and thus contributed to the probable development of schizophrenia; the only effect I'm getting from this is a loss of friends (because no one wants to know a crazy person) and stress, and the trauma doesn't "go away".

I doubt it's at all possible that trauma just "gone away" - pain has an evolutionary rationale, it serves to avoid danger. It is obvious that we want to reduce pain, but pain is reduced by avoiding the trigger rather than trying to desensitize the body to pain. If the sparrows in the bushes smell a cat, they already chirp differently - they are afraid, the experience of fear of death triggers a traumatic reaction. Meanwhile, psychoanalysts explain everything with trauma - even autism, by treating it as a mental disorder to be gotten rid of. I suspect that the natural state in which humans (and our ancestors) functioned by most of our evolutionary history was to be severely traumatized. Goal is to learn how to deal with it (like in CBT therapy) rather than trying to 'cure' it by constantly remembering.