Jung wasn't mapping out some 4by4 dimension where psychological mechanisms exist as cogs. He was constructing a theoretical framework. You refer to the theory of the unconscious as though one of its premises is that it physically exists (I could be wrong, pls b not offend). Jung's ideas weren't propositions of things that exist physically like chemical reactions or observing regions of the brain recieving increased blood flow in response to stimuli. He, and psychology, addresses the issue in the fog that lies between the physical world our senses can observe and the abstracted realm of thought that we all know, by definition of being a human, is a real thing (Kant's phenomena and noumena is a fun contemplation). Simply put, you're challenging an intensely linguistically abstracted model of something our senses and technology have only started scratching the surface of in observability - the unconscious, and similarly morals and philosophies, do not exist in time and space.