I don't wish to antagonize you and will as such will try not say anything contrary because you're ignoring what I am saying, and just trying to convince me of something I said in my first post to this thread (it's good stuff which we should all read so we don't propagate his theory but it's nothing new to me; though I appreciate your effort to write it given you can't know how informed I or later readers might be).

I refuse to believe XX persons cannot experience this symptom of gender dysphoria, and if they can, why established terminology can't be used for them (if adapted to a feminine form) There is no need for the terminology to be so stigmatized just because it was coined by a person that was so wrong and did so much consequential damage.

That being said, as androphilia and gynephilia are defined in the context of sexual orientation, and not gender, it's certainly high time someone coined a new term for this symptom.

Auto (or "self") gyne (or I suppose [?]andro for XX) philia (or "abnormal love") is pretty bloody offensive tbh, but until there's an alternative, the phrase is clearly understood to mean one thing.

Where is the problem (without reference to Blanchard)?