What you're describing is a logical fallacy. You made a stupid point and you've been wasting your time and mine trying to make the argument about your point and not the fundamental issue you first brought up. It's a deflection: you're no longer talking about whether the Pats are a good or bad drafting team, you're trying to talk about whether or not other teams have 30 "misses". You evaded the argument and are only focusing on this point, which doesn't prove anything.

Like everyone else is telling you in this thread: so what if they're the only team with 30 misses? I have no idea if they are or aren't, but you can't prove this is a higher percentage of misses than anyone else. The volume doesn't matter, just the percentage. You can't even prove if these were high or low round draft picks and if other teams did a better job with the same picks. You're like a kid holding his hands over his years and yelling "thirtymisses!thirtymisses!thirtymisses!!!!" over and over again like you're having some kind of meltdown. Your whole argument is a deflection based on an idiotic assumption. You don't even know if 30 is a lot or a little, but you're clinging to it like grim death because it's the only thing you can say here lol

Honestly, you sound deranged here dude lol. And lazy as shit too: if you think the Pats have had the most misses from 2006 through 2009 then prove it. Don't ask other people to make your argument for you. Here's the converse of that argument: the Patriots did not have the most misses during that time. Now you go dig through 31 other team's drafts and prove it me wrong.

Your opinion has been proven wrong. Why waste everyone's time with this little tantrum you're having? Either prove you're not wrong or go away lol jesus