There are plenty of examples of gender biases in the past few seasons of Survivor, Tasha being seen as someone riding Jeremy's coattails, the lack of respect for Carolyn's game by the jury, the entire perception of Jon-Jaclyn's gameplay, but Hannah getting destroyed is not one of them. She made 3 different horrible moves that don't make sense (well 1 of them does based on her exit interviews, but I don't think that was her reasoning in the moment).

Firstly, she flipped from a 6-4 majority to a 5-5 tie. People like Fincher and Cochran who flip to avoid rocks are hated. Flipping to force rocks at 10 is a horrifically stupid move. Secondly, she votes out Sunday at 7 for being a goat. Terrible decision as she should want to keep goats in the game. This is the move where her exit interview logic, wanting to avoid a 3-3 tie if Jay wins F6 immunity, makes sense, but it is something that she never explained in the moment. Then she votes out Bret over David at Final 5 for some weird reason for wanting to keep Ken's trust. This was a situation where I yelled at my TV screen wondering what she was doing. I imagine the jury was even more incredulous than I was.

Hannah's blowout loss wasn't because of gender biases. It was because she played an atrocious game. Making the argument that the lack of respect for her game is a case of gender bias and not horrible gameplay is the type of thing that causes people to discount the actual cases of gender bias.