Hi. You're going to downvote me to shit for this, but here goes:

I have a hard time seeing the Hillary Clinton issues as being significant. This is because I was alive and sentient during the Bush administration, when multiple senior administration officials - including Bush himself - lied, in the literal sense of the word, to the American people and the world in order to justify the invasion of Iraq - a sovereign nation that had not attacked America.

To date, there have been exactly zero - ZERO - investigations of the Bush administration's fraudulent claims that were used to lead the nation into the Iraq war. For example: there have been exactly ZERO investigations of Bush's fraudulent claim - from his own lips, in the State of the Union address nonetheless, that Hussein was pursuing uranium. There have been zero investigations of Colin Powell's infamous speech to the UN, in which "he gave a detailed description of Iraqi weapons programs that turned out not to exist" - or lied, in other words, to the UN and to the world.

The results of these lies was the death of thousands of Americans and untold tens of thousands of Iraqis - people whom, it must be remembered, had never attacked the United States. The result of these lies was the destabilization of the country, leading to a power vacuum that has been filled by ISIS.

So yeah, perhaps I see Reddit's orgasmic joy in Clinton's legal entanglements as a bit on the hypocritical side. OK, way the fuck over on the hypocritical side. To be blunt, I give far fewer fucks about the use of secure vs. insecure servers or phone lines than I do about intentionally lying to America in order to invade a sovereign country. Since we didn't investigate the latter, I'm not sure why we give a fuck about the former. But hey, different strokes. I'm sure you'll all tell me exactly why I'm wrong.