The claims seem pretty sound to be honest... I can see Krauss making inappropriate comments and being a misogynist.

It isn't unreasonable to see a man use his status to attempt to fornicate with attractive women. It also isn't unreasonable to assume he views a woman coming up to his apartment as a sign of willingness. - Big mistake.

Scum moves in my opinion, brings his character into major question.

I wish men would be more appropriate and not break sexual harassment laws that are there for a reason. I cannot fault him for wanting to sleep with attractive women as I share that desire. I do, however, fault him for the way he went about achieving these things and his willingness to exploit his status to do so.

Unfortunately the article takes advantage of the victims by using their experiences in an attempt to demean skepticism as a whole.

The comments are riddled with guilty by association arguments. Pack it up boys, God exists and science is useless because Krauss is guilty of sexual harassment.