Do you not see the hypocrisy in your statement? Insanely wealthy Zuckerberg, because he identifies w/ the 'progressive' liberals ideology, can do no wrong (same w/ Gates, Gore, Pelosi, Obama, Clinton's, Soros, & on, & on); BUT, if identified Wealthy dude identifies as a Republican or Conservative, the motivation can 'only' be to further line their pockets, gain power, & must always be motivated & connected to some sort of 'phobia'..

The post was on Liberal left, but purdy must defend by stating "but what about the Republicans", & "their" backers, which must be the 'Koch' brothers. Refusing to see in whom they identify w/, which they automatically see w/in the opposite.

Then, because they see issue w/ those they identify w/, but convince their self that it can not be, yet have no rational rebuttal, they toss out the ad hominem attacks ('islamaphobic' 'twit', must have vengeance for being 'fired',).

Curious, do you know the difference between Islamists and non-Islamists Muslims? Do you understand what a phobia is, or simply parrot what you hear by you liberal media & political god's? Do you know the history of Islam? Have you ever read the Koran? Have you even cared to take a look at your liberal political god's political donators, or their bank accounts (compared to their public elected servant salary)? You just might go into shock when you look into these items. Might be shocked that the majority of richest politicians are actually progressive liberals. You might be really shocked to find out that the career liberal politicians have just as much, if not more so, big business campaign donations- nearly identical to that of career republicans (some exceptions. Ron Paul had been a public servant for many years, but his campaign funds came from small donations, and his lifestyle showed as much). You think Clinton or Gates or Zucherberg live in a modest humble home? You think the Clinton's non-profit is truly concerned about helping the poor? It might shock you that they live in palaces, and that the Clinton's run their non-profit (embezzlement, extortion, corrupt) charitable organization w/ only 6-10% going to directly helping those in need (&, that is even questionable if it really does do anything to the immediate needs of said people). And let's not forget that, while she was Secretary of State, her foundation recv'd huge sums (a good chunk of the foundations donations) from foreign govmts, (at least 20), who just so happened was given quick approval and delivered arms- $165 Billion worth of commercial arms sales (double of that under Bush 2nd term). Saudi Arabia contributed nearly $10million, and, Boeing (who just so happens manufactures the F-15 the Saudi's were wanting, donated nearly $1million to the Clinton foundation (not surprisingly, Boeing got the contract, Saudi's got the advanced military weapons and F-15's, which many warned was unbalancing the Middle East). This is but 1 of $151 Billion in pentagon brokered deals completed, for 16 of the countries/ regimes that donated to the Clinton's foundation..

Power & money corrupt, and takes a very strong, morally upright individual to not succumb, and this is for those who had some sort of belief in God before gaining said wealth/ power. For those who do not believe in God, such temptation w/o any perceived possibility of eternal judgement is far more difficult to resist.