Ok, is there a chance you can't address what I'm saying and keep replying with the same amount of non existing arguments to every post, other than the fact that you're not able to support your points of view with any data?

Women produce traces of testosterone, great. Is the amount of testosterone women produce at all comparable with the amount men produce? Obviously not. Is this the reason why women take testosterone when transitioning to men? Clearly. So what part of what I said about cis women being at a disadvantage vs women who injected their ass with testosterone do you struggle to reconcile with?

Dude you either try to have an intellectually honest conversation or you can gtfo, I really don't care at this point. We have already established the fact that you talked out of your ass when you stated there are "tons of male trans athletes beating cis male athletes", cause there literally isn't any, and that was the whole point of the last two hours.

You even managed to get to the right conclusion that trans people should not be allowed in sport competition because of all the things they need to take to transition, but you just don't seem to come to terms with the outcome being against what you want. I really can't help you internalize this information, I'm sorry.

You had asked for examples of trans women having a clear advantage over female athletes, I gave you 3 very real and clear examples.

I asked you to give me one example of a trans man who has found any success in a major sport, and you couldn't.

That's because no matter what a woman does to her body, she'll never be as strong as someone who was born a man and spent their life practicing a sport that requires strength. And no matter what a man does to his body, he'll always be stronger than the vast majority of women who spent their life practicing a sport that requires strength. You don't like that, that's your problem, not the athletes'.