Second Half Game Thread: Dallas Cowboys (12-4) at Green Bay Packers (12-4)

Please tell me more about being horrid, you dumb illiterate twat.

There it is...your "parody." Keep the cringe coming. lol

Wrong again. I said "a football (notice how I intentionally did not use the word "extra") move doesn't matter,"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA....unbelievable how fucking dumb you are. You're sitting here trying to argue now that saying "extra" matters in this context. MORON...ANY OTHER FOOTBALL MOVE AFTER CATCHING THE BALL WITH TWO FEET IN BOUNDS IS "EXTRA." That is why the rule is written like that. AGAIN, IT NEGATES THE NEED TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS. God you're dumb. The dumbest person on the internet.

EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA....now you'll prattle on, being the dumb ass you are, endlessly using that word for no reason.

First you don't know the rule....then deny you said what you said...now this.

Like I said, Dez's football move doesn't matter because it's not considered an extra/second/additional football move if it's part of the process of the catch

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA...facepalm so hard. Seriously....I keep repeating it but its just true...you are so fucking dumb. And all of this because you lost an internet argument. How would a distinct football move separate from the catch also be part of the catch? You're just desperately arguing ANYTHING. Pereirra repeatedly stated that if it was deemed he jumped and stretched out to tray and score...that is an extra move. The judgment was that he didn't. But that wasn't what we were arguing about...we are arguing about the rule which you didn't know when you started this shit and now don't understand (or are pretending to). So you're saying if he was attempting to score by stretching the ball over the goal line...that wasn't a separate football move? Moron.

And he caught it near his body with both hands...why didn't he keep it there...why did he move it to one hand and stretch for the end zone. "IT WASN"T EXTRA!!!!!!!! WAAAAAAA...IM FUCKING DUMB" Predictable answer coming in.

It's not considered an "extra" or "second" move if it's within the process of the catch, MORON.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA....seriously. When you grow up, do NOT become a lawyer. So what part of the "process" made it a non-catch? Oh! The ball hitting the ground!!!! Thats what the rule is about and the exception, 3c, invalidates that part of it. Get it, you incredible jack ass? So why was it ruled incomplete? If you're going to answer, the ball being lost when it hit the ground and nothing else then THE EXTRA MOVE APPLIES HERE. God you're dumb. Now you're going to bullshit further and argue that he didn't have control of the ball, like predictable bullshit artist that you are.

Its amazing what people will go through to not admit when they're so clearly wrong. All because you didn't know an extra football move was part of the rule.

Can you quote where I said second move isn't in the rule? NOPE!

YEP!!:

It doesn't matter if he made a football move before actually securing the catch while going to the ground, tho.

Either you didn't know the rule or you don't understand it. Your pick, dummy. Rule 3c clearly states that an extra move after catching it makes what happens when "you go to the ground" irrlevant. Keep denying it like the stubborn lummox you are.

Second?? Where does it say second move in my quote, which you just transcribed?

Holy fuck. ANY move seperate form the catch...like diving for the end zone...is a SECOND move. Thats the entire point. See above "EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA"....you're so embarrassed about not understanding a simple rule that you're resorting to endless semantics. You're a child.

I rest my case, your honor. Some people just aren't born to be smart. Just like I called it. You're a sad pathetic mentally-impaired moron without the most basic of reading comprehension skills. Go back to flipping your burgers.

HAHAHHAHA...god I love yuor cringe.

ANd just like I thought, you'll keep ignoring when I point out your lies....so I'll keep reposting them:

Yes I did, and I said it was while in the process of making the catch. You must be blind.

No you didn't - not until I corrected the rule for you, nimrod. Go find it and post it here. You won't. You'll keep being the bullshitter you are.

So where did you say that? Will you post it? Nah, you'll just keep repeating EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA and SECOND SECOND SECOND while not understanding the rule or how its applied.

Also, going to repaste the shit you conveniently refuse to answer:

Nope. I said the football move is irrelevant because it has to be "additional," after the catch, not part of the process of the catch, just like Pereira said.

lololol....again, dumb ass....why would there be talk of an extra move negating the need to complete the process? So in your stupid scenario how would a second move apply? After he didn't fumble the ball when it hit the ground? You're so fucking dumb its incredible.

Ill keep repasting these until you come up with (im sure yet another)hilarious answer. Act like a child, get treated like one.

/r/nfl Thread