So, I think it's a fair question and everyone does business a little differently. I'd say it depends on your relationship with your agent. I don't typically split my commission, but time to time I have reimbursed or refunded a certain amount to my repeat clients. I always give them the same quality of work every time. In other instances, alot of my clients are first time homeowners and are paying absurd amounts in what's still a hot market so I help out where I can. But that's not everybody.

If you think you can handle it on your own, with an attorney, that's good for you, I have alot of respect for buyers who are willing to take it on themselves. Most won't, when they realize how much attention the transaction is going to need. A good agent will manage the process to be smooth, reduce stress, and allow you to focus on details with the loan, title, etc while they take care of the paperwork (which there is quite a bit of), communication between all parties, and coordinating all the aspects of the contract to move in a timely manner. This is also in addition to market research and communication with clients. Your agent's value is more than just the information they can bring you and if they can justify it, then I think they deserve their commission. If you find the service lacking, or you think you can handle it with just an attorney, then I'd say your path is pretty clear and wish you best of luck.