And anyone who believes that size is the most important determining factor in a fight is also a true amateur. It is a typical western view: that power and size equates to victory. That to be good at fighting you just need to lift weights and practice punching a bag. This is only true in fights between novices who have no idea how to generate power, or aren't aware of how much a man's instinct for violence can improve his chances for victory. Look up that video from a couple weeks ago of the guy on crack who is impervious to damage: he takes pepper spray to the face, doesn't go down when hit in the legs with a baton, keeps walking with a taser shooting electricity into him for several minutes, and requires three or four men to be subdued. That was just a guy of average size. In that case his power was drug-induced, but it does reveal the innate strength the human body is capable of when limits are removed.

White people do not understand actual mechanics of motion and manipulation of force the way the Asian schools do. They only see fights in terms of slug fests, both sides punching each other till one goes down. Brute savagery devoid of art. Naturally in such circumstances victory goes to the larger man. Yet my sixty year old Sifu could kill this ape man tank easily, because he wouldn't let the monster hit him. And because he was a debt collector thirty years ago, he has the internal capacity for destruction, he does not have subconscious limits about hurting people that hinder the average person's movements whether or not they're aware of it, whereas the majority of western fighters are just pampered athletes who like punching things. They don't have the intent to kill and maim. The human body is very easy to take apart regardless of the enemy's size and strength. Do not be so quick to write off the smaller opponent.