I mean, if you know about Malcolm X you know he stopped being violent AFTER prison

You weren't talking about AFTER prison, you spoke of his association with an organization and quoted him (out of context) from his time after prison.

Also, he wasn't devoted to anti-violence campaign that I am aware of.

I acknowledge that there is a lot about Malcolm X that you're not aware of. You should acknowledge that, too. Malcolm organized anti-domestic violence training for the men of the NoI. He trained his congregants in non-violent protests (you probably know there was no violence at any NoI demonstration under Malcolm's leadership).

but he still adopted violence or at least encouraged it when he believed it to be necessary.

He did not adopt violence. He did not encourage violence except to say that it's everyone's right to defend themselves from the brutality, mostly by police, that his congregants experienced. So your contention that he was an extremist is bullshit. Every college campus teaches self-defense to women who might be raped. To say that unless women submit to rape without defending themselves they are violent extremists is absurd and you should be ashamed of yourself for suggesting more women should be raped.

I do not know of any specific protests,

Then you shouldn't have said he was a violent extremist.

If you want to tell me why I am wrong and inform me on more truthful information I will accept it.

The problem is that you seem to know it all already.

After all, all the information I give you is from what I was told previously.

You can easily find a copy of the Autobiography of Malcolm X, and more importantly, collections of his speeches in book form.

All I know is that Malcolm X did not mind violence,

You don't know that. Because it's not true. You're still pretending to know things about which you have only the most pedestrian information.

All I know about the Nation of Island is that they are responsible for turning Mr. X from violent, to non-violent actions while he was in prison.

This is not true. But it still undermines your contention that Malcolm was a violent extremist within his organization(s). He was in prison because he possessed a stolen watch. No violence.

However, I still find reason to believe that Malcolm X encouraged violence if it was necessary for people to act out in violence.

Defending oneself is not "acting out".

I'm wrong, which I may be! I just may not know it.

Correct. Yet you still insist that you're right with your Snapple bottle cap history. Even now you insist that he "adopted violence...encouraged violence...didn't mind violence..." That doesn't sound like someone who wants to learn the facts. That sounds like someone whose mind is made up.