She's already lost 19 states. How could she lose so many states when she has everything?
For god's sake, no one is saying or has ever said Hillary Clinton is absolutely perfect. Why is she losing states? Because she's running against a populist candidate at a time when a lot of people are really fucking angry at the government, both liberals and conservatives.
But she keeps on losing. Over and over again, she loses.
Why do you keep saying that? She just won Nebraska last night (although it's non-binding). She just one Pennsylvania, New York, and pretty much all of New England within the last few weeks. Can't I also say "Bernie Sanders can't stop losing"?
Anyone else who had the system she has would be winning everyone of these states hands down.
A) I think it's bullshit to claim she has the "media support" you're claiming, but let's not even get into that. B) BERNIE SANDERS HAS MONEY. In fact, he's spent a fuckton more of it in this nomination process than she has. And at this point, in fact for months now, HE HAS NAME-RECOGNITION. You keep implying he has none of these things but you're totally wrong, and if you were right that would mean Bernie Sanders has run a seriously shitty campaign.
How could that possibly reflect well on her? If you thought she was talented, then she should be winning.
SHE FUCKING IS WINNING, FFS.
No one wants a president who had all the advantages in the world then limped over the finish line.
Clinton won the last 6 of 7 primaries before Obama became the nominee in 2008.
People want someone who can win strong and finish strong.
And that's what they're getting. She's hundreds of pledge delegates ahead of Sanders, she won the most important and populous states, she's poised to win in California, and she near-unanimous support among super delegates. She's finishing this race stronger than President Obama did, for the love of god.
She's a joke.
These "arguments" are a joke. You just sound bitter. I support Clinton but not even I'm willing to suggest Bernie Sanders has no appeal to people -- he clearly does and I think he's run a decent campaign. But if you think Clinton should be beating the shit out of Sanders even more than she already is, I'm not sure how that's supposed to make me think any better of Sanders.