"Uncircumcised" is a complete misnomer and it shouldn't be used

For the THIRD TIME NOW, I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DO WHAT YOURE DOING.

Are you talking about quotes? Very, very basic formatting. And like I just said, even if you can't do reddit's basic formating, actual quotes "insert text here" is easy.

there is no tactic.

Frankly at this point, if it wasn't a tactic before (which it still is because "it's easy to make these quotes"), it is a tactic now. It would take 5 seconds for you to learn. Bad faith.

why would I think it’s a problem here?

Already addressed! The very first time. And ignored! Here it is, notice how I explained how it's a problem!

What is an exception to what principle? Please quote what you are referring to. Sorry to say this is such a convoluted way of responding. For each point in your numbered list I have to go back and try to figure out what you're responding to. Quote the text you're responding to please and thank you. I have no idea what this is referring to and can't figure it out. As it is, I stand by what I've said: the term uncircumcised meets pretty much all of the criteria to be called a misnomer.

And again:

I shouldn't even have to look back at my old messages to see what you're talking about. Really. The convoluted way you're responding means someone has to flip back and forth between messages, line things up, and try to figure out what point you are responding to at each line. Maybe you skip points, maybe you're addressing something twice. Who knows. It shouldn't be a jigsaw puzzle just to know what you're talking about.

I literally explained why it's a problem. Literally. But once again you go on like it's not been explained.

What the hell is wrong with you?

Ad-hominem fallacy!

I’d responded to everything that I saw and you’ve dismissed my responses, started straw manning me and now have decided to accuse me of foul play?

I addressed each response. Literally. What strawman, the one I responded to where I addressed all the context of that paragraph in the next 3 quotations, which you conveniently didn't respond to?

What have I done to you that you’d assume this

Literally addressed! Once again ignored! Here it is:

of a stranger who was just trying to have a conversation? You’re the asshole here. Not me. I’ve legitimately been trying my best to have a respectful conversation but for the reasons previously stated you’ve clearly not tried to do the same. Like you’re responding now, but as per the time tag I wrote this 2 WHOLE HOURS AGO. I don’t even think you’d asked me not to double message or whatever at that point, or i at the very least hadn’t seen it.

/r/unpopularopinion Thread Parent