You INCORRECTLY both assumed and said I was saying D3 was inferior to D2.
I quoted saying D3 wasn't great for its time, heavily implying D2 was great for its time.
If you can't see the difference then you have only your own ignorance to blame. Don't shove the blame from your lack of comprehension onto my unwillingness to demean you with teaching you to read like a toddler.
I "incorrectly both assumed and said"? Surely you can see the irony of what you said. My reading comprehension is great. The issue here is your vagueness. And please, don't forget what you said earlier:
I'm not saying D3 is necessarily bad, but bad compared to games that released with beautiful innovations like D2.
That unpleasant feeling you have right now is the realization of the mistake you just made.
How about you don't completely try to miss my point? Just because you're siding with the circlejerk of "D3 is great now guys!" doesn't mean you should just say anything for some measly internet points.
Don't be a sheep, think.
No thanks. Your point didn't make any sense to me so I wanted to know more. I asked you a few questions and you deflected. You also assumed that I actually like Diablo 3 and I think it's because you're defensive. Is it so hard to explain why you think Diablo 3 is inferior to Diablo 2? That's what you implied when you said that D3 is bad compared to D2.
I said I was done here but I simply cannot let this shit slide. And don't be a sheep? Hahaha! What a joke. Don't have arguments on the Internet if you can't backup anything when you get called out.
Let's see: