Efficiency isn't a binary positive or negative. You outlined exactly why that is in your last comment, and now you're contradicting yourself because you realized you defeated your own argument. A spot up 3 from any of their non-Simmons starters is probably a more effective possession than an Embiid post up. And part of their poor shooting is Embiid's black-holiness.

In what way have I contradicted myself? What are you even saying? Lmao

Answer this question, and think carefully: does Embiid score the ball at an efficient rate, yes or no?

I gave you a direct link. It is a demonstrable fact that the team was worse on offense with him in the game. Point blank. Your position here is that you'd rather bury your head in the sand.

I think you need to look up the definition of the word fact. Advanced stats are not the be all end all of anything. Taking them for gospel without applying any sort of context is not analysis that should be taken seriously.

Take the Nuggets for example. Paul Millsap is ranked above Jokic in that exact same category you’re using. Would anybody argue Millsap is more impactful to the offence than Jokic? No, because it would be an absurdly stupid opinion.