Far more young men also get their driving licenses as soon as possible, which means, (and it's true) then collectively, men have the most driving experience, and the most kilometers driven, so naturally, they'd have more accidents, if you adjusted the numbers to be the same as females, then you'd see the number of accidents also drops drastically, since men, just drive more than females do.

Again, it is nothing but generalizing, and I'm glad you've finally said it.

There is nothing to be addressed, a lot of major accidents, are not caused by people driving fast but by others around them who decide to cut them off, without paying attention to their surroundings, or decide to "Police the streets" when it is not their job and hog the left lane, even though, the law states, to keep right except to pass. These same individuals will hog the left lane and claim they go exactly 90 km/h, which is the speed limit, but have at some point in their merry lives, broken the law and driven over the speed limit.

The problem is, not a drivers speed, but the lack of integrity between drivers, especially those that seek to slow down traffic because they themselves are not confident drivers and expect everyone else to fall to their level to keep them safe, while not thinking of the faster drivers, who also share the same road and paid for the same road.

That right there, is the biggest problem, but is it being addressed? No. Why not? It doesn't serve the agenda well.

Again, if you adjusted the driving experience and number of drivers between men and women, you'd see, the accident numbers become much less for men, and that lowers the percentage which means it does not need to be addressed. If it does need to be addressed, then anytime a women gets into an accident, every woman's insurance should increase proportionately as well, correct, I mean, that is the most fair right?

Or are you against this as well? Only because you're a misandrist yourself?