If you're so bloody lazy as to not be able to click a few links then I don't expect this to go very far. Literally every single article in those results is about some Republican admitting to this being for partisan advantage. Pick. One. And. Read. It.

Also, you never answered my question: why are you against improving the security of the election system to ensure the integrity of future outcomes?

I believe we already did that and we're good where we're at. What fraud would indicate we're not secure enough already? I seem to recall a lot of court cases recently that got thrown out about that sort of thing...

I'm really curious... do these arguments you're putting forth really convince you that we need more security? Do you really go around asking if everything that needs to be secure is as "secure as possible" or do you ask "is this as secure as it needs to be?" You just come off as a massive hypocrite because you're obviously using special logic to support this case that nobody in their right mind would employ in other areas of their life.