I quote you: "I dont want to join the party, I'm just trying to find out their views on it (...) Ok well i prefer to support parties...".
So, as i say "good luck with the politicians from the parties you said you are going to vote for ( few with the integrity of Tessa Munt ), who have just shown they are ready to gamble with the notion of whether there will be contamination, as so thoroughly demonstrated in the USA, or if just one single person's health might be affected by fracking."
Also, all the data ( the, properly numbered 50 paragraphs of my original link:
http://our-compass.org/2012/01/30/50-deadly-consequences-of-lab-animal-experiments/
-the one you complained about for being non-peer-, same one that has writen and highlighted in red, right under the title, the word "source":
http://www.vivisectioninformation.com/index.php?p=1_10_50-disasters-of-animal-testing
with the sentence highlighted in blue, right under the title "From US Doctors Group Americans fro Medical Advance":
https://www.afma-curedisease.org/
has been collected from this web Americans For Medical Advancement (AFMA) which states in its first paragraph, "is focused on improving healthcare by improving research. By using scientifically viable research methods we hope to see safe and effective drugs brought to market faster and cheaper. Studying diseases in animals in hopes of predicting human response, developing drugs based on the misconception that animal studies are predictive for humans, and testing drugs for efficacy and safety in animals are not viable ways to develop drugs."
If this was so easy to find for someone whom you said you didn't think he understood animal testing, why haven't you been able to access such pay Americans For Medical Advancement (AFMA)?.
And finally, I really do hope so..., as I say, there's probably no other way to research for a cure for something as important as cancer, so I think it should be an exception, and I'm sure that the Green Party will address this issue, and people, for once, will decide.