Can you now please refer to the original article, as was my intention.

Because it is. Tne context includes Jim Crow and the persecution of Ghandi which Cruz leaves out.

150 years ago. He doesn't refer to the persecution of Gandhi, nice try though.

Yes. And today. And last week. And before Brown vs. Board in 1954 and before Jackie Robinson and when Alabama decided to restrict voter registration.

I don't see why that was mentioned.

And since when is 900 years ago the same as 150 years ago?

Cruz focused on Obama's mentioning of the Crusades. Obama shouldn't of mentioned the Crusades. If Obama couldn't come up with an argument without citing the Crusades then he deserves to be criticised. Whether it was 900 years ago or 150 years ago.

It was a historical context.

It was beyond stupid. He shouldn't need to delve that deep into the past to say how Christians and Jews are just as bad.

And Cruz either didn't have enough fruit juice or coffee to be able to listen to all of it, or he, like Trump, and the other candidates wants to spread malicious intent where it isn't because Christian web sites eat that stuff up.

Please tell me you see the irony with the forwardprogressive article and your statement. Please. The irony is so so sweet. Surely you can recognise that. I really, really hope you aren't partisan enough to not be able to recognise the irony.

Can you now please refer to the original article, as was my intention.

Can you now please refer to the original article, as was my intention.

Can you now please refer to the original article, as was my intention.

You're wasting a lot of time and energy swinging the argument away from the poorly written and agenda riddled article.