A hungry Gwyneth Paltrow fails the food-stamp challenge four days in

See there's a difference between starting with a conclusion and finding the data to support it and starting with the data and choosing the model which best fits it.

huh? I'm saying the amount of variables I could list would make it impossible to conduct such study. Also, a thousand other variables that are still unknown would have to be added to the study... ever heard the phrase unknown of the unknown? Studying such broad topic is impossible. That's like trying to scientifically find the cause of laziness.... how possible is that?

Median weekly wages for women are only higher for never married women under 35.

what is the point here then? Also, why wouldn't you surprised that the world capital of fashion, media, and healthcare wouldn't attract high income women? And North Dakota probably has more high income men. Color me surprised. Also, all of those cities have a significant migrant/black population. I bet no study ever takes this into account. This pop science bullshit propaganda will be the end of this society. Whatever. There is no data to something that can't be measured. You can't possibly adjust for everything. A supposed discrimination in one industry is an advantage in another. Wages many times don't really reflect work input. Read my example about how all men's jobs are being outsourced or taken over by immigrants meanwhile with expanding government and bureaucratic functions, women's job market is growing. A slight different in wages don't matter here - would you rather be a construction worker or some office bureaucrat downtown? No way men have it easier in any imaginable setting. Let's all drop this bullshit already.

/r/nottheonion Thread Parent Link - ashingtonpost.com