If we label GMO's

Despite the threat of being downvoted into oblivion for detracting from the circlejerk, I'll assume you are genuine in your question.

There have been a lot of press about glyphosphates and it reminds me of the press around cigarettes. Perhaps it is healthy to drink. I'd rather know more about the long term health effects of prolonged use before I feel good about eating it. Unbiased studies are hard to come by. Its rare to know who's funding them, whether it be the environmentalist nutjobs or one of Monsanto's many subsidiaries.

example:

http://www.vancouversun.com/health/weed+killer+used+possibly+carcinogenic/10911032/story.html

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/halifax-moves-to-ban-lawn-and-garden-chemicals/article4163265/

The statements like "Safe when used correctly" come back to my non-trust of major corporations. If it was used incorrectly, do I TRUST that the corporation would take the loss of the crop over the possible contamination of the food supply? I don't think I do.

Add this to the dozens of documentaries that tell people how horrible it is and I'm left with a general.... "well... I don't know" feeling that I don't want to have when salivating over a fresh salad.

To be honest it hasn't affected my diet choices yet, but I think I'd rather say away until I feel it's safe.

/r/funny Thread Parent Link - i.imgur.com