Marriage before was not based on merit. This is somewhat like Christian salvation. You were married because you reached sexual maturity.

Marriage allows all doubts to be allayed because a) there is no choice involved, and thus no regret

Without choice, there can be no question.

Marriage was not based on merit so that everyone could be married. You were not married because you were XYZ, but because you were XYZ you might receive a better wife or husband.

Marriage allows people to be themselves, because they can now be themselves around women. Women who are not their own will not view them as a threat, because said man can now fuck his wife and has no interest in these other women, no wandering eye.

Marriage can restore natural relations between men and women because men need no longer view women as a threat, or as the 'holders of sexual intimacy, who distribute this unfairly'.

Why? Because to each his own, to each his own means no more wandering eyes, no more questions, and more what could have beens. Why do you think adultery is punished by death in the Bible?

Marriage fulfills the biological imperative and allows the person to function without thinking about sex, because sex is taken care of. And since you're married your kids will be taken care of. And since you have kids your life's purpose (reproduction) is complete, and you will be allowed to do what a man does: take care of people, both men and women, and his kids.

Your instincts can flourish naturally, and women and children will be the natural recipients of it. This is what submission is, allowing someone to be who they are.

Dating should not exist, it is awkward. That someone should have to validate themselves, and then propose sexual intercourse because they are XYZ. This has never existed before in history. This is why that Elliot Rodgers fellow was mad, and rightly so, but he was completely unable to articulate his problem/insight.

That someone should have to go through dating and settle down is awkward, it's an unnatural problem that has been resolved. The person will wonder: why was I never validated in the first place?

tldr: the restoration of the natural relations between men and women in society will solve all problems in society and more, this is because each man will have his own woman and and each woman her own man.

This way they can regard other women outside their marriage naturally, not as a threat. The women will no longer be plagued by doubt either, and will not have to validate themselves.

Pandora will be stuffed back into the box.

I can also prove why gay marriage is uniterally bad (although it's a symptom in itself, and a necessary conclusion from the concessions needed to make the marketplace work in the first place, and by work I mean: exist).

Gay marriage is bad not in and of itself, but a necessary conclusion from choice.

Choice dilutes marriage. Because marriage becomes diluted... fill in the blank

Gay marriage is a natural conclusion from hypergamy. Without hypergamy it would not exist.

Originally I thought that gay marriage was bad because of the concessions necessary to make it a thing. But in reality gay marriage follows from those things, sort of like how tipping one domino... etc.

That's it.

I said unheard of before because AFAIK, no one has said the above except me.

But this is a natural conclusion from the existence of the marketplace. The seduction community and PUA was not a thing until hypergamy existed.

So these are all recent things.