I don't know about that. I want to see how Rand Paul would handle an AMA.

I was sorely disappointed in the way that Sanders approached problems.

Campaign finance was a problem, because the Cochs use money to elect republicans. No mention of George Soros and his billions or the foreign countries donating more money than the Cochs.

Gerrymandering was a problem because the Republicans use it to get elected, not because it is an issue that leads to large sections of the population not being adequately represented represented. No mention of the Illinois claw, or California.

I had hoped that he would attack issues like these and others and an independant. Attack them because they are inherently wrong, unfair, and evil.

But he consciously chose to simply toe the party line and act as a mouth piece attacking the opposition.

This is the bullshit that keeps our broken ass fucking two party system going. It is why I can't vote for a candidate that support rights like gay marriage, the second amendment, school finance reform, environmental protection, work placement programs, and limited government. In the same candidate. Pick 4 of those at random and you won't find a politician that backs all 4.

I personally will vote for whoever points his finger at the other guy less and says to washington, "look assholes, this shit is fucked up, and wrong. It does not matter who is doing it, when, where, or why, it needs to stop because it is wrong."

I think I will just have to settle for whoever attacks the other party less, and remains focused on the issues, and remember, the issue is not a Democrat, it is the fact that he was a lower to pass a bill to have the government buy all his worthless land in Nevada. The issue is not a republicans that was picked and financed by a billionaire and elected because of gerrymandering.

The issue is that these things are happening and not being punished in the first place.