Yes let us be pedantic about the word whore. When i can find a better word then i may use it. For now, let us say that a lvl 3 whore is sucking dick, a lvl 2 whore is a stripper or posing nude, and a lvl 1 whore is a model. The shared thing being- them making money off of the fact that men desire their body.

In regards to art, i cna give you one subjective objective standard: The amount of work that went into it. This is yet another thing i already adressed with my 16th century painting. If you think that art can be reduced to some asshole snapping a pic of naked women with his iphone, then ok. And if some peasant gets inspired by that, does that make it objective art? Here is a definition from the dictionary: a. The conscious use of the imagination in the production of objects intended to be contemplated or appreciated as beautiful, as in the arrangement of forms, sounds, or words.". Ok, so this is art by definition only if the shitty photographer managed to make himself think that he is making art. But it doesnt matter anyway, because i already told you that all this farse is solely for promotional purposes of every party involved, and neatly packaged so peasants think of it as artsy or deep.

What you think of them is irrelevant. Fact is that every single famous actress is gorgeous, every single musician is handsome. It appears that ugly people simply do not posess talent. Ooor maybe they are just props to sell a product, what do you think is more likely.

Im sure you could google up both of their tits if you wanted. Also, having tits in every movie is sooper important to tell the story, right, its not so kids have something to fap to.

Whatever

In short: Let us agree to dissagree.