While I am actively interested in determining the scope of these "military actions", I still cannot get any data on any Russian involvement there. Your tabloids publish idiotic garbage (which you seem to mistake for the actually happening things), and so far I can point just to a couple of accidents that kind of hint at something Russian there. And I am saying this as a military veteran.

So, without knowing what our actions in Ukraine actually are, it's difficult to have an opinion on them. What, however, clearly happens in Ukraine is the total lack of prompt Russian military intervention, and on this I do have an opinion (since it's real). I think Russia has to intervene in full force and stop the war they have there. While crazy idiots on both sides can do to themselves whatever they please, this is not fair to the enlisted military and it is definitely not fair to civilians.

So, I do support a Georgia-type action where the Russian military attacks the Ukrainian military on the ground in the conflict zone and forces it to withdraw.

This is my plan B though, my plan A would be the same outcome (peace) with nobody getting killed. I don't see how to achieve that unless the Ukraine makes or is forced politically to make this decision.

Given that Merkel and Holland will suggest UN peacekeepers tomorrow, it does seem this is the political solution I was hoping for. It's a pity 5 thousand people had to die for it: the earlier Russia striked, the lesser the number would have been (see Crimea: zero (well, murky two)).

Also, in case your question was loaded and you had something else in mind (like OMG PUTIN FLIES NUCLEAR MISSILES IN BRITISH WATERSPACE), then nothing happens there either. In real world. There was one incident where our plain entered Latvian (?) airspace for 50 seconds (that's 25 seconds in), but the rest of your A-A-A INTERCEPT BALALAIKA is your tabloids playing you, nothing is happening there.