What you want is for me to change "there are no drawbacks" to "there are basically no drawbacks" or "there are essentially no drawbacks." I'm not interested in doing that because it's unnecessary and doesn't detract from my broader point that anyone with even a passing familiarity with the data agrees that raising immigration is good and necessary. The issue isn't the minefield that OP makes it out to be in his/her original post and I was responding to that.

Your critique of my post is purely an issue of semantics and nowhere do you suggest what you're suggesting you suggested. If you knew what the drawbacks were you'd have raised them. You don't so you didn't. How do you expect me to respond. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

As to your second, nonsensical point, I'll ELI5 it for you: lowering immigration rates has the drawback of turning Canada into a third world country within 50 years. Raising immigration rates has the benefit of that not happening.

Now, to reiterate, your posts are inane and badly written. Fuck off and stop responding to me. Good day.