He's not the first person to voice these ideas. For as long as there have been people promoting social justice, there have been critics. The channels and language may change, but the themes and message remain the same. Seems a reasonable claim.o I'm not operating from zero information. Dissecting my original comment, here ere are my claims:

1. He's self-congratulatory. I'm going to claim that's reasonable. From the grandiose title of the video "How I Created The Anti-SJW Genre, And Almost Destroyed The World" to how influential he thinks he is, a lot of self-congratulation is going on.
2. He's not the first person to voice these ideas. For as long as there have been people promoting social justice, there have been critics. The channels and language may change, but the themes and message remains the same. Seems a reasonable claim.
3. He seems like an arch-douche. Entirely subjective assessment. I'm entitled to my opinion.

Those are the only claims I've made. Not sure what logical problem you're referring to.