If the people who made statements about men in a thread about an actual rapist were to be derailed by notallmen posters, then they'd be totally in the right.

Damn, even stretching myself in every way I could think of, I wouldn't be able to write such a ridiculously bad false equivalence.

I mean, even the structure of this discussion is very different to the one in this hypothetical of yours. But I'm sure it makes perfect sense in your head because you must be right, but what I take from this is that you tried to justify a generalization about men, further proving my original comment.

proper writing [...] "hurr durr you jus dun haff readin cum-pruh-hen-shon"

"hurr durr you jus dun haff readin cum-pruh-hen-shon"

okay kiddo

Too subtle? No, impossible. In fact, I couldn't have been more obvious. No, you just can't detect mockery of your words, you're that deluded about your own intellectual superiority.

Anyway, as interesting as your self-aggrandizing rambling is, I already corroborated what I want to and going in circles with you would get boring.

Cheers.